Difference between revisions of "Talk:Constitution"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "I'd like to dispute Constitution being primarily good for those who rely on Armour. Especially if you have a low chance of being hit without any other evasion, you need high h...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 13:03, 9 April 2015
I'd like to dispute Constitution being primarily good for those who rely on Armour. Especially if you have a low chance of being hit without any other evasion, you need high hp until you get a good shield. An armour character, on the other hand, can become so immune to damage he doesn't necessarily rely only on hitpoints. --UnLimiTeD (talk) 12:03, 9 April 2015 (CDT)